PHDINN904 Final Review

The conclusion of PHDINN904 Doing Innovation. With CROWDCUL as case, Tin was part of the team delving into cultural crowdfunding, and its implications on both artistic production and funding models. The question posed by the team:

How can cultural crowdfunding be a responsible innovation?

In a sense, artistry and crowdfunding are polar opposites. In our assessment, we assessed the research object according to the intersection between different stakeholders, the values/attitudes that emerges on different ends, and the future implications of our findings. Some of our key findings: there is an inherent banking component in crowdfunding, possibility to scope out not-so-obvious consumer markets, clustering of other platforms (social attributes to monetary), a proxy of artistic shame.

The team consisted of Alice Demattos (lead and project-owner), Julia Winslow, Kelvin Ivankovic. The course responsibles, were Inger Beate Pettersen, Tobba Sudmann, Øystein Høvig. The expert panel from the industry itself, consisted of: Ingeborg Astrid Kleppe (NHH), Kari Øritsland (VIS), and Jostein Stalheim (HVL).

• Team

  Alice Demattos, HVL
  Julia Winslow, HVL
  Kelvin Ivankovic, HVL
  Tin Phan, NMBU
  

• Duration

  03-04. May

• Teaching staff

  Inger Beate Pettersen
  Tobba Sudmann
  Øystein Høvig

• Theoretical framework

  Stilgoe’s responsible innovation
  Grünwald’s responsible innovation

• Expert panel

  Ingeborg Astrid Kleppe, NHH
  Kari Øritsland, VIS
  Jostein Stalheim, HVL

• Links

  Norske Albumklassikere
  CROWDCUL
  PHDINN904
  RESINNREG